RSS

CASE 2 – Demolishing the analytical chemist’s evidence in a “drug” case

Demolishing the analytical chemist’s evidence in a “drug” case

In a case in which my client was charged with being in illegal possession of a scheduled substance, I cross-examined the scientist who analysed the substance at the Government Pathology Laboratories and he soon admitted under my cross-examination, that his chemical analysis only reflects the percentage composition of the substance in terms of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and sulphur, and that he is unable to identify a particular isomer of the substance.  (Isomers are two or more chemical compounds with the same chemical composition, and molecular weight, but differing in at least one physical or chemical property). He conceded that different isomers are indeed different chemical compounds, despite identical chemical analysis, and that he cannot possible tell the court anything about the real identity of the substance that he analysed.

After just more than an hour in court my client left the court a free man

 

Advertisements
 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: